Woman who had an affair sues cell phone company for causing her divorce

Today, a friend told me about the news of a 37 year old Toronto, which continues Rogers Communications, a major telecommunications company in Canada, for causing her divorce and losing his job. In a televised interview with CTV by this woman, the woman admitted she had an affair short, but argued that the billing practices Roger revealed his infidelity, which leads her husband to leave. Her husband had the cable from the family and the Bill of television under her name. She had a cell phone account in her maiden name with the bill sent to their home separete … until her husband called Rogers to add Internet and residential telephony and the month after Rogers sent a “comprehensive” bill at home, including detailed bill of his mobile phone Portable. The husband has seen several long telephone calls to a single telephone number, called number, and a “third party” broke the story. Rogers continued to unilaterally terminate his contract of cellular and include it in the account of her husband without his knowledge or approval. The divorce law suit is $ 600,000. The woman said her husband walked on her and their two children after the case came to light, and she lost her job because of performance, not because she was upset over the end of her marriage. In her opinion, she had an affair very short, it was longer to start, and it should not have to lose everything on it. Of course, there were many comments of visitors who read the news online. Some say Rogers would not have done, most saying it would not have been the case. At present, it should be clear that there are consequences to everything we do, if we are sorry or not, if we wanted to or not, if we tell the truth or not. Just ask Tiger Woods and John Edwards. But I wonder if her husband had seen the phone # for the opening of the bill that came to their home, she would continue her husband for damages to his marriage and work on the grounds of invasion privacy? How would you use this “third person” who left the cat out of bag? The matter was private and confidential information for you. I was told that the e-mail, letters, blogs are proof that if the court so requests, the companies have come forward with them. So who should we prosecute, the court? It will be interesting to see how this case ends. I will keep you informed. In the meantime, know that if you tell the truth, life is simpler. Martha Chan is the co-owner and vice president of marketing and Divorce Marketing Group Divorce Magazine. She is responsible for all online initiatives and offline business. She is married to Dan Couvrette and is a stepmother of two son. Sign in to her on LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook. She can be contacted at (888) 217-9538 ex. 36 or marthac @ divorcemarketinggroup. com.